Commentary: Thereby hangs a tale--the creation of tragic narratives in forensic psychiatry.
نویسنده
چکیده
In my commentary, I suggest that the criminal court is a place where justice examines tragedy, as described by Aristotle in his Poetics. I suggest that there are strong parallels with Aristotle's account of tragic narratives and the concepts of representation and performance of forensic expert testimony, as described by Griffith and Baranoski-especially in relation to the creation of voice. On this account, the forensic expert's psychiatric court report acts as a tragic narrative that makes defendants come alive as people. Such performance is crucial for the criminal justice process, where there are competing accounts of the truth, and the expert narrative can articulate the voice of different parties. However, there are other legal fora where the role of the forensic psychiatric voice may be less clear. I close by suggesting that we continue to need rich and subtle exploration of these topics, as exemplified by the work of Griffith and Baranoski.
منابع مشابه
Commentary: Stories and histories in forensic psychiatry.
In this commentary, I reflect on the narratives of offending that are generated in the courtroom and those that are generated in the therapeutic space between an offender patient and his or her therapist. I discuss the similarities and differences between these different stories and explore the role of the psychiatrist in both cases.
متن کاملCommentary: toward a unified theory of personal and professional ethics.
In response to Dr. Ezra Griffith's essay, we support the view that forensic practice cannot be cleanly divided from its ethics foundation in medical and general psychiatric practice. Personal and professional values cannot be separated in formulating a unified theory of ethics for professionalism in forensic practice. We support Dr. Griffith's narrative perspective and offer a delineation of ho...
متن کاملForensic historiography: narratives and science.
Psychiatrists function, in part, as historians who rely on patient narratives to help them understand presenting mental disorders and explain their causes. Forensic psychiatrists have been skeptical of using narratives, raising concerns about their lack of objectivity and potential for bias. They also have criticized narratives as being more performative than scientific. Recent authors, however...
متن کاملOn the roots of modern forensic psychiatry: ethics ramifications.
The historical origin of modern forensic psychiatry, as well as the circumstances of its evolution, may be defined and described from several vantage points. In this article I present a critical reading of Richard J. Bonnie's article, published in the Journal, in which he assigned the budding of modern forensic psychiatry to the 20th century. Although I concur with Bonnie's historical analysis,...
متن کاملCommentary: authorship and training in forensic psychiatry.
This commentary is written in praise of Dr. Simon's Presidential Address with exemplification of certain of his themes. Forensic fellowships have now become the training ground for the next generation of forensic psychiatrists, who need to be encouraged to find their own best way to write. They should also be encouraged to participate in research with senior mentors and researchers, as publishe...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
دوره 39 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011